Plenty of threads on the board about it. It won't affect fuel economy except for the fact that the new found power/responsiveness has you wanting to turn the throttle a lot more to put an even bigger smile on your face.... that tends to destroy economy. But, if you are willing to flip off the EPA, you can flip off the gas pump too...
A big part of the gospel of Guhl is that leaving the 'flies in actually increases intake velocity compared with them removed. That is all fine and well if anyone cares what the velocity is in the intake tract but then somehow that "fact" leads the flock to believe that velocity increase also increases engine power output. So the reflash has something for everyone I guess, the above story for those who choose to believe (or blindly follow idiocy), and humor for the rest of us.
:-)
The easiest, fastest and most absolute way to open the 'flies the soonest is to remove them and put them on a shelf somewhere where they cannot do any harm.
Brian
120 mph, right? 100km = 60m
A big part of the gospel of Guhl is that leaving the 'flies in actually increases intake velocity compared with them removed. That is all fine and well if anyone cares what the velocity is in the intake tract but then somehow that "fact" leads the flock to believe that velocity increase also increases engine power output. So the reflash has something for everyone I guess, the above story for those who choose to believe (or blindly follow idiocy), and humor for the rest of us.
:-)
The easiest, fastest and most absolute way to open the 'flies the soonest is to remove them and put them on a shelf somewhere where they cannot do any harm.
Brian
A big part of the gospel of Guhl is that leaving the 'flies in actually increases intake velocity compared with them removed. That is all fine and well if anyone cares what the velocity is in the intake tract but then somehow that "fact" leads the flock to believe that velocity increase also increases engine power output. So the reflash has something for everyone I guess, the above story for those who choose to believe (or blindly follow idiocy), and humor for the rest of us.
Is that different from speeding up the air into the TBs? Isn't that why Kwackers put the intakes in the front? What does a supercharger do? I know. So many questions.
That's funny. I've tried to get the adherents to explain that with little success. I relate it to getting a potato chip stuck in your throat and trying to take a deep breath.
I think they are mistakenly referring to the "Bernoulli Effect" of increasing the velocity of a gas or liquid by forcing it thru a smaller opening. When cruising thru mountain passes, I sometimes run into bursts of high winds that are being squeezed thru the canyons. Very surprising at times.
I did one of those conversion thingys on the web. Did it again and came up with 124.274238 mph. I hate the metric system. Can't figure anything out at all.
I did one of those conversion thingys on the web. Did it again and came up with 124.274238 mph. I hate the metric system. Can't figure anything out at all.I just penciled out the math and got...200 kph=124.27423845 mph.
I just penciled out the math and got...200 kph=124.27423845 mph.
Can somebody tell me what kind of impact the reflash has on fuel consumption? Thanx in advance for your reply
Yup. I agree, nice 200km Hwy run does a soul good. I had to see if the Dyna Beads did there job. And yea they did.
Murph has a cruise set up for the 1400.
Tomp was referring to "Cruise Missile" not cruise control Question was regarding hand wind deflectors.Correct. Sorry I didn't make myself more clear. tomp