I looked around to find the right forum for this--if this is the wrong spot, apologies (and please move).
Starting up riding a 'new to me' Concours, after a few years of not riding. I'm looking to pick up a pair of riding boots, to use in my normal riding. Normal riding will be a lot of commuting and intermediate distance (30-90 mile) trips, in predominately rural (and sometimes suburban) environments. Think: lots of 2 lane rural 55mph roads.
There are a bunch of boots that look great, but what I'm primarily trying to decide is if I need the rigid sides and shin protection that some boots offer. For example, the SIDI Canyon boots look great and get good reviews, but have very limited ankle and shin protection. On the other hand, something like the SIDI Armada or Dianese TRQ Tour have far more extensive shin and ankle protection. I'm not planning on track days or tail of the dragon at this point...I just want some comfortable, waterproof/breathable boots that offer greater protection than gym shoes or hikers...and I'm trying to decide how much additional protection is worthwhile or necessary. I'm sure if you crash you want all of the protection, but I'm looking for some practical advice.
By way of comparison, if I knew I was going to crash, well, I wouldn't ride...but if I was going to ride, I'd wear full leathers. I'm not planning on wearing full leathers every day. So what's a reasonably safe compromise...or should I not compromise on foot protection, and just go to boots with greater protection?
For my work, I'll probably end up bringing shoes with me, and changing when I get to my destination. So while there are times that a 'normal looking boot' would be nice (e.g. going to pickup carryout Thai food), I'm not planning on doing a lot of riding where I'll get somewhere and have to do a lot of walking in the boots.
Sorry if this is long--trying to give a lot of info to solicit helpful responses.