Suit against LoJack for false advertising, false recovery rate. If you bought a LoJack between 6/15/06 and 8/13/11 you may want to check into:
Morin vs, LoJack Corp., et al, case # 10-cv-05659 in the Central District of California.
If you bought "LoJack Recovery for Motorcycles" or "Subsequent 2nd owner's package" from Lojack you are a class member.
Perhaps google the info above for more information.
***I've always considered LoJack worthless compared to my insurance (which paid twice in the 90's for stolen bikes) and never purchased such a product 