Kawasaki Concours Forum
Mish mash => Open Forum => Topic started by: stevewfl on August 11, 2011, 01:21:03 PM
-
Suit against LoJack for false advertising, false recovery rate. If you bought a LoJack between 6/15/06 and 8/13/11 you may want to check into:
Morin vs, LoJack Corp., et al, case # 10-cv-05659 in the Central District of California.
If you bought "LoJack Recovery for Motorcycles" or "Subsequent 2nd owner's package" from Lojack you are a class member.
Perhaps google the info above for more information.
***I've always considered LoJack worthless compared to my insurance (which paid twice in the 90's for stolen bikes) and never purchased such a product (http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j180/stevewfl/bigthumb.gif)
-
Who needs LoJack when you have KIPASS? ;D
-
+1!
I thought only BDF and I realize the mad pow-ah of KiPass ;D
-
+1!
I thought only BDF and I realize the mad pow-ah of KiPass ;D
When have I ever complained about the KiPass ? (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-angry009.gif) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)