Well, do all you jumpers agree that alcohol use is involved in a disproportionate percentage of bike crashes and fatalities?
Do you all agree that a 3/4 helmet is less of a safety risk than drinking and riding?
Can you not see the humor of a guy with a beer in his hand calling a guy with a 3/4 helmet on his head an unsafe or high-risk rider?
Cut and stop. Either you see the irony or you don't.
But let's continue the discussion. Not every rider that drinks rides while drinking, drunk or under the influenence, either in the absolute or the legal sense. That should be a given. But it should be pretty clear that riders who drink ride under the influence (either legal or absolute) far more often than riders who don't drink. I don't know, nor did I accuse, whether the first two posters rider after drinking. I don't have to know that answer to see the irony. But if I had to bet, I'd bet that the OP has never had, and will never have, a crash where he needed the extra protection of a full-face helmet vs a 3/4 far sooner than I would bet that the next 2 posters never have and never will ride with even the slightest trace of alcohol in their systems. Obviously, I do not know which, if either, bet would be a good idea, but that's how I percieve the odds.
No offense was intended, but I'm still very comfortable with the post, and with my statement that there was no jump (assuming a jump to conclusions was meant) made by me.
Have a nice day.