It would be virtually impossible to reverse engineer those handlebar stanchions well enough to do a decent stress analysis on them. The first problem is the guessing what material they are made from (aluminum certainly but <which> alloy). Then there is the material treatment they were given (T2, T4, T6, etc.). Finally modeling them accurately given all the intricate shapes and tapers involved.
By blocks I assume you mean risers? If so, then no, adding bar risers will not change the way the bars are stressed. The risers themselves cannot add stress, only because the angle of the user added stress to be applied differently.
The easiest way to review the bars' performance is in actual use; there just are not many broken sets of bars around on these bikes. The time most likely to break handlebars is when they are heavily loaded by a large rider and the bike being braked very hard and then striking something (obviously talking about a vehicle accident now). At that point breaking one or both handlebars isn't really an issue and a case could even be made that it would be safer to break the bar(s) out of the way for the inevitable forward motion of the rider. Unless of course the stanchion breaks in the middle and leaves a ragged post for the rider to be impaled on....
Brian
I think the bars are strong enough for normal use. The use of Canyon Dancers or other means of tie down in my opinion over stresses the bars. Adding blocks with normal usage I believe over stresses the bars. If an engineering reader has access to a stress analysis program I would be curious to find out if it does.
I believe Kawasaki should have designed in more safety for the use of tie downs.
That's my 2 cents.