Author Topic: Water wetter  (Read 8622 times)

Offline lather

  • Arena
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1598
  • Country: us
  • And I think my spaceship knows which way to go...
    • Louisiana Chapter MSTA
Water wetter
« on: June 16, 2011, 09:07:59 AM »
I am trying Redline Water Wetter in both my VFR and my C14 this summer. For the VFR to improve its poor low speed cooling characteristics. For the C14 to decrease the amount of heat coming through the seat and tank.  Redline claimes up to 20 degreef reduction. I can't really tell any definite difference going by the C14 bar guage. For one thing I never paid a lot of attention to the guage as the C14 has always seemed to cool well as apposed to the VFR. Also, I don't have any faith that the BAR guage system is very price or accurate. On the other hand the VFR has a numerical gauge and I definetely see a difference of 5 to 7 degrees lower temperature according to the gauge.

As for seat of the pants (literally), subjective result the C14 seems a little bit cooler in the crotch area. The heat coming from the cowl vents does not feel less, if anything more. To me this makes sense since the only way to make the engine run cooler is to extract heat via the radiator and that heat goes out the cowl vents. This is fine with me as that heat does not bother me.
Nothing worse than having your balls go missing.

Offline Pynikal

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 194
  • Country: us
  • From power cruiser to power tourer.
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2011, 09:09:38 AM »
i used it on my built civic and it seemed to do the job very well.

Offline Conrad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5822
  • Country: us
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2011, 09:20:33 AM »
I don't get how this stuff can work. The C14 creates X amount of BTUs in heat right? This stuff claims that it can reduce that heat, where does the heat go?
Northern Illinois   Silverdammit '08 C-14 ABS

"Don't bother me with facts, Son. I've already made up my mind." -Foghorn Leghorn

Offline The Pope

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 792
  • Country: us
  • COG #9994 (NC AAD)
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2011, 09:55:50 AM »
I don't get how this stuff can work. The C14 creates X amount of BTUs in heat right? This stuff claims that it can reduce that heat, where does the heat go?

Per the Red Line site:

"* Reduces or eliminates bubbles or vapor barrier that form on hot metal surfaces to reduce coolant temperatures by up to 20°
  * Superior heat transfer properties compared to glycol-based antifreeze
  * Compatible with new or used antifreeze (including DEX-COOL and long-life versions) to improve the heat transfer of ethylene and propylene glycol systems
  * Improves heat transfer and reduces cylinder head temperature "
The Pope
2011 C-14 Atomic Silver...... aka ImprovedSilverDammIt.

"The Universe is a contest between engineers making things idiot-proof and God making bigger idiots. So far, God is winning by a wide margin." Unknown author, well I don't know who said it.

Offline Kazairl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 243
  • Country: us
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2011, 10:24:29 AM »
Step 1 Drain coolant
Step 2 Fill with straight distilled water
Step3 Enjoy A cooler running engine

  Straight water cools much better than a 50/50 Water Glycol mix.  As long as the temps stay above freezing this would be your best bet to make the engine run cooler. Or else use a 70/30 Water Glycol Mix. It won't protect to as low a temp as 50/50 but it will cool better.

Edit: I should add that Water Wetter may have additives that the Glycol also has to prevent corrosion and the like.

Offline Mister Tee

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Country: 00
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2011, 10:31:14 AM »
I don't get how this stuff can work. The C14 creates X amount of BTUs in heat right? This stuff claims that it can reduce that heat, where does the heat go?

I was going to say.....

Offline Conrad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5822
  • Country: us
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2011, 11:23:12 AM »
I just googled this and did some reading. The concencious is that it's snake oil. If you're running 100% water, it MAY help some.

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008/01/redline-waterwetter%C2%AE-review/

YMMV
Northern Illinois   Silverdammit '08 C-14 ABS

"Don't bother me with facts, Son. I've already made up my mind." -Foghorn Leghorn

Offline lt1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 489
  • Country: us
  • 2008 C14
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2011, 12:01:45 PM »
I just googled this and did some reading. The concencious is that it's snake oil. If you're running 100% water, it MAY help some.

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008/01/redline-waterwetter%C2%AE-review/

YMMV
They must have changed the link after you posted it.  What I read was that the author performed a non-scientific test without proper controls and was not impressed.  There was no consensus (assuming that is what you meant) that the product was ineffective, as the comments ran more favorable for Water Wetter than unfavorable.

It is what it is.  If you have a well-functioning cooling system with excess capacity and you are not running on the track (spilled coolant is dangerously slippery, WatterWetter is not), you may not need the product.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2011, 12:51:16 PM by lt1 »
Eyes, Brain, Hands.  Repeat.

Offline Fretka

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
  • Country: us
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2011, 12:19:40 PM »
WW worked for my 1991 vette but I doubt it will make any diff when it comes to radiated heat from the tank. The only way to fix that (that I know of) is to direct cool airflow to the top of the motor/bottom of the frame and it will exhaust back and down around the swingarm pivot. Definitely works but is a huge engineering job.

Fretka
Wretched excess visited upon an innocent C-14

Offline Conrad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5822
  • Country: us
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2011, 12:55:21 PM »
They must have changed the link after you posted it.  What I read was that the author performed a non-scientific test without proper controls and was not impressed.  There was no consensus (assuming that is what you meant) that the product was ineffective, as the comments ran more favorable for Water Wetter than unfavorable.

It is what it is.  If you have a well-functioning cooling system with excess capacity and you are not running on the track (spilled coolant is dangerously slippery, WatterWetter is not), you may not need the product.

Yep, that's what I meant.  :-[

That wasn't the only site I read, there are many and they all pretty much say the same thing.
Northern Illinois   Silverdammit '08 C-14 ABS

"Don't bother me with facts, Son. I've already made up my mind." -Foghorn Leghorn

Offline lather

  • Arena
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1598
  • Country: us
  • And I think my spaceship knows which way to go...
    • Louisiana Chapter MSTA
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2011, 04:37:21 PM »
The  mechanic who recommeded water wetter to me owned his own shop and ran a motocross team and used it in his race motors. Per my post I can't make any real claims for the C14 due to the vaugueness of the temp guage. But for the VFR I was struggling to keep the gauge below 220 with slow or stop and go riding using Honda Pre-mix. With the Water Wetter I am rarely seeing  more than 198.
Nothing worse than having your balls go missing.

Offline maxtog

  • Elite Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8948
  • Country: us
  • 2011 Silver
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2011, 05:31:24 PM »
Straight water cools much better than a 50/50 Water Glycol mix.  As long as the temps stay above freezing this would be your best bet to make the engine run cooler. Or else use a 70/30 Water Glycol Mix. It won't protect to as low a temp as 50/50 but it will cool better.  Edit: I should add that Water Wetter may have additives that the Glycol also has to prevent corrosion and the like.

+1
You took the words out of my mouth.  Plain water (distilled, is preferred) performs much better than 50% glycol mixes, which is what is typically used.  Now, running plain water is NOT a good long-term idea- it offers NO corrosion protection and no boil/freeze protection.  However... 50% mixes of glycol are WAY overkill for most people.   The default 50% is down to -38F!!!!  Where I live, it very rarely gets below +20F.  So read the packaging/research for mixing more MORE water and less glycol antifreeze/coolant.
Shoodaben (was Guhl) Mountain Runner ECU flash, Canyon Cages front/rear, Helibars risers, Phil's wedges, Grip Puppies, Sargent World seat-low & heated & pod, Muzzy lowering links, Soupy's stand, Nautilus air horn, Admore lightbar, Ronnie's highway pegs, front running lights, all LED, helmet locks, RAM Xgrip, Sena SMH10, Throttle Tamer, MRA X-Creen, BearingUp Shifter, PR4-GT, Scorpion EXO-T1200,etc

Offline Kazairl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 243
  • Country: us
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #12 on: June 16, 2011, 06:13:08 PM »
The  mechanic who recommeded water wetter to me owned his own shop and ran a motocross team and used it in his race motors. Per my post I can't make any real claims for the C14 due to the vaugueness of the temp guage. But for the VFR I was struggling to keep the gauge below 220 with slow or stop and go riding using Honda Pre-mix. With the Water Wetter I am rarely seeing  more than 198.

 Are you using Water water added to 50/50 or just straight water? It is a good improvement either way. Have you checked to make sure your radiator isn't getting plugged?

 For racing Water Wetter plus straight distilled water does make sense. But I'm not convinced on its usefulness on the street.

Offline JetJock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
  • Country: us
  • 2010 Concours in wicked fast BLUE
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #13 on: June 16, 2011, 08:42:25 PM »
WaterWetter does work, as do some other products. I run Maxima Koolaide in my race bikes. Your engine will run cooler, but whether you'll be able to objectively prove this, is another matter.


Offline JetJock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
  • Country: us
  • 2010 Concours in wicked fast BLUE
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #14 on: June 16, 2011, 08:45:17 PM »
I don't get how this stuff can work. The C14 creates X amount of BTUs in heat right? This stuff claims that it can reduce that heat, where does the heat go?

Yeah it works, as someone else posted. We run this in the motocross bikes, where the big thumpers will boil over in a matter of seconds on the starting line. It's been widely proven to improve the cooling in these engines and will work in any water cooled engine far as I can tell. The claims are not bogus.

Offline shiney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2011, 11:17:37 AM »
These additives have surfactants in them which lower the surface tension of the water allowing it to make better "contact" and transfer heat better.

Offline Pokey

  • Arena
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2487
  • Country: us
  • WESTERVILLE OHIO 'Twit"
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #16 on: June 17, 2011, 11:24:31 AM »
I rate this crap right up there with "Scamsoil"
2006 DL1000  2006 SV650
08 C14 "gone"

"All we have to do is decide what to do with the time given to us". Gandalf the Grey

Offline jamiemac

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 605
  • Country: us
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #17 on: June 17, 2011, 05:33:26 PM »
It dropped the idle temp of My Jeep from 205 to 195. That is significant, because crawling along in 4lo in the rocks is tough duty, & I can do that with the air conditioner on & not overheat. I pretty happy with that.
2008 C14, Area-P carbon fiber, PCV, Rostra Cruise, LAAM leather seat, Optilux 1500 & MondoMoto MM10 lights, Cee Bailey windshield, BMC air filter, Warm & Safe dual dash mounted heat troller.

Offline Y0ssarian

  • Arena
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
  • Country: us
  • 97% chance of being hit by a piano
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #18 on: June 19, 2011, 07:39:11 PM »
These additives have surfactants in them which lower the surface tension of the water allowing it to make better "contact" and transfer heat better.

Bingo. Fill a glass until it's "too full", or until the surface tension of the water makes the top surface bow outward taller than the top of the glass. Now drip a drop of dishwasher detergent into the glass; the extra water runs out, and the surface of the water is now flat. Without the surface tension the water can't form a meniscus, and on a microscopic level that allows the water to have more contact with the surfaces inside the engine and radiator. More contact means more BTU's transferred per liter of coolant flow, so the engine can run cooler. The C14 has a robust cooling system, so any improvement would be minimal...maybe keeping the fan from kicking on for a few extra seconds. On my '86 1000 Ninja with a borderline cooling system in the Tucson heat, it dropped average temps about 10° across the board. I doubt you'd cool the tank or seat area much, but what the heck...I've been wrong before. Try it, and report back (but be objective!)
The words of the prophets are written on the cylinder walls.

Offline JetJock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
  • Country: us
  • 2010 Concours in wicked fast BLUE
Re: Water wetter
« Reply #19 on: June 20, 2011, 09:11:07 AM »
I rate this crap right up there with "Scamsoil"

Well, you're wrong. Tested in the racing world where 4Stroke motors run so hot you can't sit on the starting line with the engine running for more than a minute. The stuff works. Plenty of independent tests have established this.

"Tested" is different than just having an opinion about something you know nothing about.