At this time, there is little point. In fact, it is a small step in the wrong direction. For the power consumed, the very best LEDs will put out about 1,000 lumens for 12 watts, not inclusive of power supply losses. HID's will produce 3,000 + lumens of light for about 40 watts. But the kicker is the light emitting density: LED's are a flat faced emitter while HID arcs (the actual light source) are a full 360 degree light producing device. That means that a parabolic cone can be used to focus up to about 58% of that light down the road while only about 25% of the led's light makes it where we want it. Further, HIDs use a projector housing very well which produce both high and low beams both very efficiently as well as very crisply; LED's do not lend themselves to that functionality.
Right at this moment, an HID arc simply cannot be beat for putting light just above the road where we use it. LED's are progressing rapidly and I expect this situation to change but they will need to reach the next generation or possibly the one after that to directly compete and crush the performance of LEDs.
Please do not that any of that the wrong way- LED's are outstanding as forward lighting, especially as supplemental lighting, already. And they will get better soon. It is just that HIDs are really so outstanding in performance that they will be hard to slam past them.
Brian
What we need is someone to come up with an LED setup to replace the OEM lighting? Wonder who we have that can do that? 