Kawasaki Concours Forum

Riding => It's not a Concours - other Bikes => Topic started by: wroman on August 10, 2013, 12:07:59 PM

Title: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 10, 2013, 12:07:59 PM
Anybody (and I mean C14 rider's) have any opinion on the 1700 Voyager.  Thinking of maybe picking one up used.  I am aware of certain issues and I know they are completely different but after having ridden a Connie anybody's input would be welcome on the basic bike.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 10, 2013, 01:06:07 PM
Anybody (and I mean C14 rider's) have any opinion on the 1700 Voyager.  Thinking of maybe picking one up used.  I am aware of certain issues and I know they are completely different but after having ridden a Connie anybody's input would be welcome on the basic bike.

Having ridden and owned a Voyager XII, I think that the 1700 is an abomination.  My opinion.  It looks too much like a cruiser.  Can't stand the looks of it.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 10, 2013, 01:12:48 PM
Gheesh Jim, tell me how you really feel?
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 10, 2013, 01:13:37 PM
You really want to know? ;)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: stevewfl on August 10, 2013, 01:37:31 PM
I'd rather ride a:

(http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/nickolay/nickolay1211/nickolay121100049/16451283-cargo-ship-at-the-port.jpg)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Tarheelbob on August 10, 2013, 02:03:24 PM
Here's what I posted a few weeks ago when one of the forum guys was looking at HD Road Glides and Victory:

"That being said, I have also ridden the newer Kawasaki Voyager, and it is an excellent package also at a more desireable price point. They compare favorably to the Road Glide: v-twin, full lockable matching hard bags and trunk, frame-mounted fairing, all the cruisecontrol/intercom/MP3/etc. bells and whistles. The Voyager also has more spacious rider / passenger accomodations that the HD, which can be a little cramped. Check one out."

They ride great and are comfortable for seriously covering the miles. The engine makes it torques a little higher in the revs than the HD 103, but opens up a little with a Power Commander and slip-ons. Big, comfortable, modern v-twin cruiser with lots of bells and whistles. My friends that have them, love them. One guy just bought his second one. I like the Voyager and the Vaquero, but every time I ride one, I remember HOW FREAKING SLOW THOSE THINGS ARE!  ;D

Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 10, 2013, 02:23:59 PM
I'd rather ride a:

(http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/nickolay/nickolay1211/nickolay121100049/16451283-cargo-ship-at-the-port.jpg)

+1.  It's a wannabe HD and it sucks.  Not the ship.  I like that.  The bike.  I didn't like it when it came out and that opinion hasn't improved with age.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Daytona_Mike on August 10, 2013, 02:36:16 PM
It is a Vulcan with faring and saddle bags.  Great for  wife hauling.  Going from Sport Tourer to a  cruiser can be boring but sometimes some people like that.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 10, 2013, 02:38:04 PM
Not me.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 10, 2013, 02:47:07 PM
Wife hauling is the intention.  I just rode a Goldwing and remembered why I sold mine in 2003.  The wife loved the GL1800 though.  I don't blame her but I just could not ever get comfortable with the riding position or the handling.
I know the the Voyager is a slug compared to the C14.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: maxtog on August 10, 2013, 03:12:29 PM
modern v-twin

I have a hard time dealing with that phrase- seems to be an oxymoron
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: stevewfl on August 10, 2013, 04:07:54 PM
I have a hard time dealing with that phrase- seems to be an oxymoron

+1

I bumped into a guy in WV "sport-touring" on an old one.  Engine looked the same.

(http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j180/stevewfl/ashevillesummer10/DSC_0064.jpg) (http://s80.photobucket.com/user/stevewfl/media/ashevillesummer10/DSC_0064.jpg.html)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 10, 2013, 04:31:02 PM
Quote
    modern v-twin


I have a hard time dealing with that phrase- seems to be an oxymoron

I don't know, I had an RC51 and it was pretty modern. Loved it.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: martin_14 on August 10, 2013, 05:01:26 PM
I know the the Voyager is a slug compared to the C14.

+1
the list of what isn't is rather short.
That said, there are some nice bikes out there with completely different approach to motorcycling. If the OP likes it, I say "go for it".
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Tarheelbob on August 10, 2013, 06:50:21 PM
I have a hard time dealing with that phrase- seems to be an oxymoron

Well, I understand that comment from a geometry standpoint, and get that old saw you're stating. But, "modern" for a v-twin means: fuel injected, water-cooled, hydraulic valves (no adjustment - ever), and about as reliable and bullet-proof as you can get. All things that the old school v-twins weren't.

But, I suspect you already know all that.  ;)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Cuda on August 10, 2013, 07:34:21 PM
Have your wife get her own bike , someone had their wifes  nice Shadow for sale  ;)
I NEVER liked anyone on the back of my bike's   even when I was young and the girls were 120lb. not sure what my wife weighs  :-X but If I put her on the back,  my front tire would be off the ground alot ::)
I might buy a Honda Rune someday , not to replace the 14 , just to be different I guess , It's one of those bikes you hate or like , I like them.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Spanky on August 10, 2013, 08:44:57 PM
I hope your wife never reads this thread   :yikes:

I have often thought that a cruiser would make a great second bike. I could never have one as my only ride, but they seem nice for just putting around.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: chappy5oh on August 10, 2013, 09:04:46 PM
When it comes to Cruiser style touring bikes, the only one I have ever truly enjoyed is my Valkyrie. Yes I know it is not a v-twin or a four, but I think that is what I like so much. It has the straight tracking, couldn't move ya from your intended track if a tornado came through heavy cruiser feel, but the flat six is so very smooth, and it even handles, pretty well.....for an 800lb. bike. Good low mileage examples can still be found, and the fit and finish really was top notch......IMHO.....
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: chappy5oh on August 10, 2013, 09:06:51 PM
Forgot to mention, mine is a tourer not a standard, so I have the luggage and wind screen, just not the batwing style fairing.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 11, 2013, 09:04:30 AM
not sure what my wife weighs  :-X but If I put her on the back,  my front tire would be off the ground alot ::)


(http://www.pingelonline.com/product_photos/yzf_installed_c.jpg)

 :finger_fing11:
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: stevewfl on August 11, 2013, 09:49:42 AM
^^^^^^^   (http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j180/stevewfl/avatars/lol8.gif) (http://s80.photobucket.com/user/stevewfl/media/avatars/lol8.gif.html)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: stevewfl on August 11, 2013, 10:23:04 AM

I don't know, I had an RC51 and it was pretty modern. Loved it.

water cooled, that one really is a modern example.  We were talking Vulcans and Hardley Ablesons and such  ;D
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: texrider on August 11, 2013, 11:54:28 PM
I took one out for demo, and have to say it's pretty sad really.
The Vulcan 2000 could tow three of these while carrying one, faster than you can go on one.
A Yamaha Venture with carbs is a far better touring cruiser.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 12, 2013, 03:59:05 AM
As was the XII with carbs.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 12, 2013, 05:51:58 AM
"The Vulcan 2000 could tow three of these while carrying one, faster than you can go on one.
A Yamaha Venture with carbs is a far better touring cruiser."

  I find that interesting.  A lot of people were upset they never put that 2,000 in a touring cruiser.  I have never ridden a Voyager but did ride a Venture a few years ago and thought it was far better than I suspected.   I rode a Victory Vision for three years before the C14. I tried to do simple tuning stuff and was never satisfied with the result. I should of left it stock. The C14 on the other hand has no glaring faults in stock tune.  That has been a pleasure.  I rode a 2007 H-D Ultra and that bike was the same for me as the Vision, could never get it right as far as tune. Those bikes are an excuse to buy stuff. I think I am talking myself out of this whole mess.  This is what happens after sitting at home for a few weeks recouping from the accident.  What is the saying. Idle minds are the devil's playground.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 12, 2013, 09:10:20 AM
water cooled, that one really is a modern example.  We were talking Vulcans and Hardley Ablesons and such  ;D

Yeah, I understand. I actually do appreciate Harleys and bikes like MotoGuzzi but I wouldn't classify their engines as "modern."
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 12, 2013, 09:11:23 AM
I took one out for demo, and have to say it's pretty sad really.
The Vulcan 2000 could tow three of these while carrying one, faster than you can go on one.
A Yamaha Venture with carbs is a far better touring cruiser.

The Venture is much better. As a matter of fact, I was interested in buying one not long ago, until I realized it still used carbs.  ::)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: maxtog on August 12, 2013, 09:28:05 AM
Yeah, I understand. I actually do appreciate Harleys and bikes like MotoGuzzi but I wouldn't classify their engines as "modern."

Bingo.

You can do anything you want to the thing, but a 45 degree VTwin design is horribly outdated and intentionally obtuse now.  The antitheses of "modern".  The only reason it still exists it because people actually think such bikes are SUPPOSED to sound stupid, perform poorly, and vibrate the s*** out of you, or "look" a certain way.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Pokey on August 12, 2013, 09:51:36 AM
Wife hauling is the intention.  I just rode a Goldwing and remembered why I sold mine in 2003.  The wife loved the GL1800 though.  I don't blame her but I just could not ever get comfortable with the riding position or the handling.
I know the the Voyager is a slug compared to the C14.


They handle INCREDIBLE, and the riding position for most is about as comfy as comfy can get. The Voyager and many other bikes are slugs compared to a Wing, if the Wife loved it sounds like you should look at that option again. Happy Wife happy life. She is not gonna be comfy on a Ducati Diavel that is for sure.  ;)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 12, 2013, 09:56:06 AM
Max I have no illusions of what a big v-twin is but do beg to differ with the 'sound stupid' remark.  You see I bought my first Harley in 1980 and have ridden a few BMW's in my time and even a late model Indian (horrible bike).  But I know very few older motorcyclists  that would say a that a shovelhead electra glide sounds stupid.  To me that is some beautiful music.  As far as the 1700 Voyager I think that they have a different but still beautiful exhaust tone and that is part of the attraction, it is relaxing.  I hate what Harley has become and the whole crowd that populates the group but I have a few close friends that ride Harleys that put on miles that many C14 rides could dream of and have no problem with 600-800 mile days if they need to get some where.  For the most part their bikes are comfortable  and dependable and they arrive in pretty good shape.  I am still trying to get this C14 to do the same for me.  Now these are not built for road racing that is a given. I think most people judge Harley or the V twins by the crowd that gathers around them, I have no use for the culture.  I can say this now that I will never own another Harley for as long as I live, they are a younger wealthier mans money pit and I am too close to retirement. Hence I am still here.

Thanks Pokey for understanding and this was what I was looking for. By the way Pokey I lived in Canfield Ohio when I bought my 1980 Tour Glide and put on 34,000 miles in a year and a half before it was stolen. I love motorcycles and if I would look down on the people riding something other that I that would make me nothing more than a C14 version of the people I don't care for.
Walt
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: sf bay rider on August 12, 2013, 10:22:23 AM
I have an 09 Connie and a 10 Voyager. I enjoy both bikes very much. Both have provided me with good service and relative low cost to maintain. Despitie some recalls, which have been addressed. I would purchase similar units even today. The Voyager has been well complimented by varied age groups. Even an 87 y/o lady. "That bike has presense" So for the detractors. This bike comes Grand Mother approved.  Better yet. The Voyager averages 42 MPG where my Connie gets about 38 MPG. 

So, if you're heart is set on getting a Voyager 1700. Go for it. I have enjoyed many long trips on it and will continue to do so for many years. Just make sure to get ABS brakes. A real life saver IMHO

More as things develop
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: maxtog on August 12, 2013, 10:47:50 AM
Max I have no illusions of what a big v-twin is but do beg to differ with the 'sound stupid' remark.

That's OK :)  Each person has his own "ear".  To me, an attractive engine sound is something that is smooth, consistent, efficient, and quiet.

Quote
I have a few close friends that ride Harleys that put on miles that many C14 rides could dream of and have no problem with 600-800 mile days if they need to get some where.  For the most part their bikes are comfortable  and dependable and they arrive in pretty good shape.

And if everything else were the same except it were a 90 degree V twin or V four or even inline 4, it would be even MORE comfortable and dependable.

Quote
I think most people judge Harley or the V twins by the crowd that gathers around them, I have no use for the culture.

Some do, but I am speaking specifically to the outmoded/throwback "technology" of the engine design.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Bourne2Ride on August 12, 2013, 11:13:04 AM
So, if you're heart is set on getting a Voyager 1700. Go for it. I have enjoyed many long trips on it and will continue to do so for many years. Just make sure to get ABS brakes. A real life saver IMHO

I agree with the this statement. However, I'm not sure why Kawasaki saw fit not to put ABS on the Voyager Vaquero. That is essentially the same bike as the 1700 Voyager; but it has no ABS. My brother almost went down this past weekend because a cager  pulled out
in front of him on a two lane country road. She didn't see him, and pulled right out in front of him. He left a 20 foot "rear break" tire skid on the road. luckily he slid to a stop. If he'd released the rear he could have high sided right into the path of the car.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Pokey on August 12, 2013, 12:07:40 PM
If it has 2 wheels I will more than likely enjoy it for what it is, much more than what it is not.  8)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: maxtog on August 12, 2013, 12:29:38 PM
If it has 2 wheels I will more than likely enjoy it for what it is, much more than what it is not.  8)

That sounds very philosophical and poetic...
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 12, 2013, 12:44:35 PM
He left a 20 foot "rear break" tire skid on the road. luckily he slid to a stop. If he'd released the rear he could have high sided right into the path of the car.

Glad he is okay, but he almost went down because he stomped the rear brake in a panic instead of using it correctly, not because it didn't have ABS. Happens all the time. I'm glad he had the presence of mind to ride it out instead of releasing and high-siding as you said. 
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: gPink on August 12, 2013, 03:46:07 PM
That sounds very philosophical and poetic...
Pull up a chair and pass the pipe.  :)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: pistole on August 12, 2013, 04:15:24 PM
Glad he is okay, but he almost went down because he stomped the rear brake in a panic instead of using it correctly, not because it didn't have ABS. Happens all the time. I'm glad he had the presence of mind to ride it out instead of releasing and high-siding as you said.

- umm , thats kinda the definition of panic braking.

- read up on ABS brakes (on all types of vehicles , not just bikes) with an open mind. Don't be prejudiced and dogmatic.

.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 12, 2013, 05:22:07 PM
Pull up a chair and pass the pipe.  :)

I'm in!
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 13, 2013, 09:00:08 AM
- umm , thats kinda the definition of panic braking.

- read up on ABS brakes (on all types of vehicles , not just bikes) with an open mind. Don't be prejudiced and dogmatic.

.

That isn't being judgemental and dogmatic, it is being realistic. It is just a further reminder that we need to practice emergency braking techniques so we don't lock the rear wheel. Yes, ABS would have prevented that, but people have done without ABS for decades and if you don;t have it, you need to be sure you will be able to brake correctly in an emergency situation. Too many people have a bad habit of stomping the rear brake out of habit, a habit that is "practiced" on a daily basis while riding, instead of using the front and back brake correctly. I see this a lot with my friends who ride cruisers, although I have seen riders of all types of bike do it.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to be mean, I was just pointing out the fact the fault wasn't with the lack of ABS, but instead the improper use of the brake. Brakes aren't just for slowing gently to a stop at a stop sign, they are to be able to be used to stop in an emergency situation. People today have been conditioned to simply stomp the brake in their cars due to ABS, that won't work on a motorcycle that does not have ABS. Braking skills are becoming a thing of the past. Unfortunately, if you are riding a bike without them, you need those skills.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: alexx45 on August 13, 2013, 11:02:57 AM
That isn't being judgemental and dogmatic, it is being realistic. It is just a further reminder that we need to practice emergency braking techniques so we don't lock the rear wheel. Yes, ABS would have prevented that, but people have done without ABS for decades and if you don;t have it, you need to be sure you will be able to brake correctly in an emergency situation. Too many people have a bad habit of stomping the rear brake out of habit, a habit that is "practiced" on a daily basis while riding, instead of using the front and back brake correctly. I see this a lot with my friends who ride cruisers, although I have seen riders of all types of bike do it.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to be mean, I was just pointing out the fact the fault wasn't with the lack of ABS, but instead the improper use of the brake. Brakes aren't just for slowing gently to a stop at a stop sign, they are to be able to be used to stop in an emergency situation. People today have been conditioned to simply stomp the brake in their cars due to ABS, that won't work on a motorcycle that does not have ABS. Braking skills are becoming a thing of the past. Unfortunately, if you are riding a bike without them, you need those skills.

I know this to be true from personal experience. Not having practiced emergency braking definately aidded in my one and only accident. that ast well as target fixation and the brick of a brake a non-abs 09 C14 has. Practice however has taught me how to better modulate the rear brake on my 09 C14. That was the only time I had wished I'd sprung for the ABS version. Live & learn I suppose. Fortunately the bke was repaired & I healed quickly. If I had it to do again I buy the ABS.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: sherob on August 13, 2013, 11:05:46 AM
Practice should be done on an ABS bike as well, to learn how the bike (and you) will react under sudden braking... to many think it's there, and that's it. 
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 13, 2013, 11:58:31 AM
Practice should be done on an ABS bike as well, to learn how the bike (and you) will react under sudden braking... to many think it's there, and that's it.

Amen, we all need to practice,  no matter what we ride.

I know this to be true from personal experience. Not having practiced emergency braking definately aidded in my one and only accident. that ast well as target fixation and the brick of a brake a non-abs 09 C14 has. Practice however has taught me how to better modulate the rear brake on my 09 C14. That was the only time I had wished I'd sprung for the ABS version. Live & learn I suppose. Fortunately the bke was repaired & I healed quickly. If I had it to do again I buy the ABS.

Glad you healed quickly.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Cuda on August 13, 2013, 01:50:22 PM
Screw passengers


Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: stevewfl on August 13, 2013, 02:54:19 PM
There are ways to make the 1700 lighter, sexier, and MO FUN to work on  ;D

(http://www.thecollegetownlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/beerGoggles-300x336.jpg)

Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: gPink on August 13, 2013, 04:14:46 PM
Screw passengers
Depends on the passenger.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: maxtog on August 13, 2013, 04:31:39 PM
That isn't being judgemental and dogmatic, it is being realistic. It is just a further reminder that we need to practice emergency braking techniques so we don't lock the rear wheel.

This is the primary reason why I was taught to never use the rear brake for "normal" braking, so I would never be tempted to use the rear brake in a panic.  And it worked.  Of course, the flip side is that I ended up never using the rear brake EVER... which, for most riding, is probably fine.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 13, 2013, 05:46:14 PM
Screw passengers

I love the Rune.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: PH14 on August 13, 2013, 05:49:03 PM
This is the primary reason why I was taught to never use the rear brake for "normal" braking, so I would never be tempted to use the rear brake in a panic.  And it worked.  Of course, the flip side is that I ended up never using the rear brake EVER... which, for most riding, is probably fine.

I know a lot of people who do that. I definitely does prevent hitting the rear brake hard in a panic. I use my rear brake but mainly use the front. I barely touch the back. It is interesting when practicing to try and modulate it to the threshold.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 13, 2013, 07:31:12 PM
I love the de-evolution of a topic of conversation.  Anybody know how many figs in a Fig Newton.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Cuda on August 13, 2013, 08:17:14 PM
I checked but could not find out ?
Many people think that if Fig Newtons have figs in them, they must be healthy. The figs in the cookies do provide antioxidants, which help to fight against diseases like cancer. Iron and calcium, which help to make red blood cells and strengthens bones, respectively, are present in Fig Newtons, just as they are in figs. Fig Newtons are a cholesterol-free food, which is good news to eaters who are watching their cholesterol intake. However, if you are eating Fig Newtons for the nutritional value, you would be better off eating the figs themselves. All the nutrients in the Newtons are in the fruits themselves, minus the added calories, sugars, and fats from the cookie dough. In addition, due to their high fiber content, Fig Newtons may cause constipation. To avoid this, make sure you drink enough water.

What ever makes you  ( or your wife ) HAPPY buy It!
I wouldn't get caught dead on one my self,  to each their own. 
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: maxtog on August 13, 2013, 08:54:22 PM
I love the de-evolution of a topic of conversation.

Welcome to forums!  Just be glad it is still about motorcycles...
You must be new to the Internet or something :)

Subject drift has been a part of every BBS discussion board, USENET newsgroup, Email list, Web Forum, and anything else I left off.  Have lived through it all (and even survived, too)

Oh, and technically, this entire thread doesn't belong in this forum, since it really has nothing to do with the C14...  perhaps it should be moved to the  "It's not a Concours- other Bikes" http://www.zggtr.org/index.php?board=11.0 (http://www.zggtr.org/index.php?board=11.0) forum where it belongs.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: Pokey on August 13, 2013, 10:52:24 PM
(http://www.thewisestmen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/136493132936.jpg)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 13, 2013, 11:08:22 PM
Well have decided against the Voyager, you guys wore me down. That and test drove a Vaquero. Was not bad but the C14 has spoiled me for power.  The bike was solid, comfy and slow. And Max I am not new to the internet and I could care less how far off the threads go, I rather enjoy it actually.  I started the thread to find out how Kawasaki C14 owners felt about another Kawasaki model. Since this is my first Kawasaki since starting riding 1976 I am a little behind the curve on how they stack up.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 13, 2013, 11:16:26 PM
http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bb/Head_up_ass.jpg (http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bb/Head_up_ass.jpg)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 14, 2013, 04:03:24 AM
Oh, and technically, this entire thread doesn't belong in this forum, since it really has nothing to do with the C14...  perhaps it should be moved to the  "It's not a Concours- other Bikes" http://www.zggtr.org/index.php?board=11.0 (http://www.zggtr.org/index.php?board=11.0) forum where it belongs.

Well, I thought and I thought and then thought some more and decided to leave it here for now...  Course T could come along and move it with a single thought rather than using multiple thoughts.  It's all good for now, I think.. ;)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: maxtog on August 14, 2013, 05:29:47 AM
Well, I thought and I thought and then thought some more and decided to leave it here for now...  Course T could come along and move it with a single thought rather than using multiple thoughts.  It's all good for now, I think.. ;)

You are going to hurt yourself with all that thinking...
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 14, 2013, 06:12:01 AM
I think you're right...
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: katata1100 on August 14, 2013, 08:27:37 AM

A Yamaha Venture with carbs is a far better touring cruiser.

I wonder if you could add the Suzuki Cavalcade to that list. I had the cruiser style Suzuki Madura 1200, neat v4 motor that was good for low 11 sec 1/4. To this day, i still wonder why Suzuki didn't do more with that motor.
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: katata1100 on August 14, 2013, 08:33:24 AM
Well have decided against the Voyager, you guys wore me down. That and test drove a Vaquero. Was not bad but the C14 has spoiled me for power. 

Send the pcm to Guhl for a reprogram, then the eco mode will become your slug mode.
Not much room for wife on back, but she hates bikes as it is. If she didn't, I'd think of it as a benefit- I like to ride solo, been on many a solo trip. One benefit of a solo trip is being in a brew pub and never hearing the dreaded words "are you almost done?"
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: wroman on August 14, 2013, 03:29:51 PM
I never figured out Suzuki either. The Cavalcade was a monster in it's day. A friend had a Yamaha 1100 shaft drive with a Yamaha touring fairing at the time and when he had an argument with his wife would go riding and stand that thing straight up.    Didn't Suzuki make a rotary engine bike around 1976 also?
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 14, 2013, 05:43:11 PM
One benefit of a solo trip is being in a brew pub and never hearing the dreaded words "are you almost done?"

Or somewhere else for that matter... ::)
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: gPink on August 14, 2013, 06:14:30 PM
answer "You're not getting payed to talk."
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: VirginiaJim on August 14, 2013, 06:31:37 PM
 :rotflmao:
Title: Re: C14 rider's opinion of the 1700 Voyager.
Post by: katata1100 on August 14, 2013, 08:48:39 PM
I never figured out Suzuki either. The Cavalcade was a monster in it's day.

I think that SUzuki tested the waters with the Madura and when the bikes didn't sell, they killed the motor.
From what it sounds like, they had high hopes for it. A local suzi service manager said her was flown out for some tech sessions on it.It was a very nice motor- hydro adjusters, rubber mounted and it was smooth, great tq. Cruiser bikes were all the rage and one magazine said that they were testing the waters with their version of a mad max and if successful, then maybe a sport bike.
But, the Madura (they came in 700 and 1200) was a sort of strange looking bike. I bought a '85 leftover, still in the crate in '89 for around $3,000. Great bike, very comfy, only flaws were limited clearance and small tank. Had digital gear indicater, shaft, even self cancelling turn signals (why can't they put those on the C14??). Averaged 38mpg, acceleration was about equal to my buddies Ninja 750.
The Cavalcade lasted a couple of years longer than the madura, it looked like a great tourer, just like the Yamaha Venturer.