I don't need a $$$$$$ AR 15
BUT I DO NEED A Kel-Tec Sub 2000
Anyone know where I can find one
9mm or 40 Glock so I can use my Glock mags
Luckily I bought a Sub-2000 .40 cal three years ago (for $325). Now fast forward to today. I saw one at a gun show three weeks ago and the price tag was..............$1,089 !!! And this was a bone stock one with no add-ons. Mine has a 4 rail forearm, flash suppressor/comp, red dot holo sight, sling, bolt buffer, and cheek pad. If I had known ahead of time I would have sold mine for $1,089 in a heartbeat.
- sorry , but my comment above had nothing to do with being Politically Correct (or not).
- it was about being logical and believable and not crazy nor paranoid
.
Bart, what is crazy is disregarding the past. The weak minded will always follow those they perceive as the winner, regardless of who the loser may be. Advanced armament may be out of reach of the average citizen, but the spirit never wanes. Remove any hope and all you have left is a broken spirit, easily guided. Maintain hope and victory is ours.
A spark, fuel and air. Remove the fuel and what do you have? All show and no go. The gun grabbers know this.
Rino, are you implying that if we citizens did not have guns you would expect the military to take over?
Those that TRULY believe that they must be prepared to defend themselves against the US government are just crazy! If they really believe this then they need to arm themselves with much more than ARs. These nuts should be stocking up on all the same weapons are the US military. After all, it's not smart to bring a knife (i.e. an AR) to a gun fight. Why not drones or rocket launchers? If you can't afford these at least you should be stocking up on diesel and fertilizer.
The real reason to have ARs and large capacity mags is because it's your right and they are cool and when you go out and blast things it's fun. If you think a couple of good old boys with ARs can defeat the US military you must be nuts or at least very delusional.
I must be a Crazy Nut as I have been told then...cause for sure you MUST be right!
That "bunch of good ole boys" include about 30 million "boys" and "girls" who served, are serving, or own firearms who believe in their 2nd Admendment rights, WRITTEN to opress the "guvment" when someone like O-bama has been sucessful in pushing his Hiltler-esque agenda.
Yeah, I must be a Crazy Nut. But "Bart", whan your being overrun...don't yell for help here....
Oh, whos to say there aren't folks hoarding AN and FO.....or missles, HEC's, DC, home made drones, grenades, mortors, BP, etc......
and by the way...you've never seen me knife fight.....
Those that TRULY believe that they must be prepared to defend themselves against the US government are just crazy! If they really believe this then they need to arm themselves with much more than ARs. These nuts should be stocking up on all the same weapons are the US military. After all, it's not smart to bring a knife (i.e. an AR) to a gun fight. Why not drones or rocket launchers? If you can't afford these at least you should be stocking up on diesel and fertilizer.
The real reason to have ARs and large capacity mags is because it's your right and they are cool and when you go out and blast things it's fun. If you think a couple of good old boys with ARs can defeat the US military you must be nuts or at least very delusional.
Rino, are you implying that if we citizens did not have guns you would expect the military to take over?
I, for one, don't think so. I have my guns for hunting and target shooting.
and those of us who have access to drones, missles, etc will definitely make them disapear from their storage locations when the time comes.
I agree that the Federal government is a threat to personal rights. The Patriot Act stripped away our rights not to have our homes or person searched without a warrant and what about Reagan supporting the assault weapon ban of 1994. I guess that I should stop voting republican cause you can't trust them. And you guys know you can't trust the dems. cause they want to take our guns (or is it just that they want to do what Reagan wanted in 1994). I don't know, it appears you can't trust anyone.