I'm a long-time BMW owner, and I can tell you that review was biased. First of all, the 1600GT is significantly heavier than the C14, plus it has a truck-like wheelbase of 66+". Neither bike can be considered 'nimble' by simple physics, but I prefer the Connie by far. I was about to buy a 2015 1600GT, and glad I gave the Connie a chance. Not only I ended up with a better bike for my needs (I didn't need stereo, a mammoth fairing), plus BMW didn't fit the 2015 GT with any of the RT improvements I was expecting: quick-shifter, radial brakes (std on the Connie), better suspension, etc. I also happen to like the Connie's ergos better, and probably why I favored it. And as expected, the Connie trumps the BMW in every performance category except top-gear roll-ons, but I MUCH rather have the taller gearing on the Connie all day long. Not much trouble to downshift to 5th (or 4th) if needed. The tranny on the Connie is probably the best I've sampled; certainly much more refined than the clunkier BMW, although it was significantly improved for 2015. It's a matter of personal preference. But one thing is absolutely clear: the BMW WILL NEVER BE $8K better than a Connie. I was considering it because I could afford it. But it'd had never been the better buy. Ride a Connie and 1600 and decide for yourself. They're similar machines since both are considered 'sport-tourers', but quite different. The GT is a whale of a sport-TOURER, basically a touring GTL without the trunk and some ergo changes. The Connie is a SPORT-tourer, basically a sport ZX14 with bags and other touring amenities. Finally, the stereo and its interface on the BMWs is absolutel crap, so you're paying for nothing. Most people bypass it with other sources of nav and music/phone interfaces. The only thing I wish the Kawi had from the BMW is the adjustable suspension and cruise, in that order. But neither is a big deal, since I like firm, sporty suspensions anyway, and I hardly ever touched the settings on my previous BMW bikes anyway. Good luck with your choice.