Poll

When you did your 15K valve adjust, how bad were they?

All were within spec
One or more was out of spec
A few needed adjustment
Most needed adjustment
They were all messed up!
No clue, I didn't ask
To new, not done yet.

Author Topic: 15K Valves: How bad were they?  (Read 31842 times)

Offline C1xRider

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 836
  • Country: us
  • Where did all the posts go?!??
15K Valves: How bad were they?
« on: July 06, 2011, 09:20:10 AM »
I'm coming up on 15K, and was curious how much valve adjustment people were actually needing when they got there.

There are really 2 polls in one here.  Everyone should select the first or second choice, then one of 3, 4, or 5.

If you took it to the dealer and didn't care or ask, then option 6 is for you.

If you haven't done your first valve adjust yet, option 7 is yours, and be patient and your time will come!   ;D
--------------------   BACK UP YOUR DISKS PEOPLE!! -------------------------------
2012 K1600 GTL 8), 2010 C14 ABS, 2002 HD FXSTDI, 2000 XT350, 1998 C10, 1983 V65 Magna, 1978 HD SX250

Offline MrPepsi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1108
  • Country: 00
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2011, 09:36:21 AM »
All within spec.
Now I'm at 25k, so we'll see what happens at 30.
Brent Johnson 
2009 C-14 "Razzi"

Offline C1xRider

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 836
  • Country: us
  • Where did all the posts go?!??
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2011, 10:15:56 AM »
All within spec.
Now I'm at 25k, so we'll see what happens at 30.

No tweaking either, even though they were in spec?  Some people are anal about making sure they are all exactly the same.   ::)
--------------------   BACK UP YOUR DISKS PEOPLE!! -------------------------------
2012 K1600 GTL 8), 2010 C14 ABS, 2002 HD FXSTDI, 2000 XT350, 1998 C10, 1983 V65 Magna, 1978 HD SX250

Offline MrPepsi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1108
  • Country: 00
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2011, 10:17:44 AM »
The shop did it and told me they was no adjustment done or needed.
Brent Johnson 
2009 C-14 "Razzi"

Son of Pappy

  • Guest
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2011, 12:25:27 PM »
I actually trust my mech, I saw the innards and his chart, as well as the shims.  Second only needed a few swapped around.  I'm delaying the third, feeling OK with my decision to go 30K between checks.

Offline olie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Country: us
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2011, 12:49:06 PM »
All within spec but the mechanic did adjust 7 to center. Some mechanics are honest...
13 Blue Connie, 8/4/2013
16 Green Versys 1k
11 Red Vette

Offline Rawman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 155
  • Country: us
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2011, 01:35:00 PM »
I had mine done at 18K, all were within spec although 3 were right on the edge.  The Mechanic said they were probably fully seated and would not move much from there.
2009 Non-ABS
VStream, PR2s, AreaP Full Exhaust, Carbon Can, PC-V, BMC Air Filter, 151 Dyno'd RWhp.
'04 Honda VTX-1300C, '01 Kawasaki ZRX-1200R, '87 Yamaha VMax, '79 Kawasaki K-1000 LTD, '77 Kawasaki KZ-1000,'80 Suzuki GS-550L

Offline tthompsr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
  • Country: us
  • 2009 Black Concours
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2011, 01:39:39 PM »
Had mine done at 15,000 all in spec.

Offline Shadowofshoe

  • Arena
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
  • Country: us
  • Mastiff pup/human pup
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2011, 06:45:55 PM »
  So how much for the 15k check up including valves I'll be there soon got mine at 11k a couple months ago...........I know save the flames, weather sucked forever!!!

              Mike
Sooooo....we are about to be a Nation that makes you prove you have insurance-but it's not necessary to prove that you are indeed a Citizen of that Nation?

Offline IRULE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
  • Country: us
  • How sweet it is...
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2011, 08:59:39 PM »
Too new, haven't done it.  A neighbor with a 2008 C14 did it about 2 months ago, everything was perfect but the shop still charged full price because they had to open everything up and check.

I think when I get to 15k, unless I hear or feel something is not right, I will skip it until 30k.
2009 Black Kawasaki Concours 14
2009 Red Buell 1125CR
1978 Triumph Bonneville

Offline DenverC-14

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
  • Country: us
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2011, 09:41:48 PM »
Did mine at 17.5. All were within "spec", but most were close to ends of tolerances. My mech moved them all to the center of the range.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2011, 03:19:40 PM by DenverC-14 »

Offline lather

  • Arena
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1591
  • Country: us
  • And I think my spaceship knows which way to go...
    • Louisiana Chapter MSTA
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2011, 04:45:26 PM »
I did mines at 20,000 miles. Only one Ex and two In were in spec and the two intakes were at .127. I changed 15 shims.  I am in the process of doing my second check at 55,000 miles.
Nothing worse than having your balls go missing.

Offline C1xRider

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 836
  • Country: us
  • Where did all the posts go?!??
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2011, 06:47:45 PM »
I did mines at 20,000 miles. Only one Ex and two In were in spec and the two intakes were at .127. I changed 15 shims.  I am in the process of doing my second check at 55,000 miles.

Interesting, let us know how they look on your 55K inspection.  From the reports so far, they should not change much after the first one, but that remains to be seen en mass.

I'm not planning on taking my bike down to check them until we get stretch of some really ugly weather.  Our riding season is just too short to do that.  I may pop the valve cover at some point and measure, then button it up to ride while I get any bucket shims needed, then dig in again to 'adjust' them.

I never did hear why the manufacturers changed from the adjustable screw & jam nut design to the shim design.  Sure makes the valve adjust a lot less convenient.
--------------------   BACK UP YOUR DISKS PEOPLE!! -------------------------------
2012 K1600 GTL 8), 2010 C14 ABS, 2002 HD FXSTDI, 2000 XT350, 1998 C10, 1983 V65 Magna, 1978 HD SX250

Offline lather

  • Arena
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1591
  • Country: us
  • And I think my spaceship knows which way to go...
    • Louisiana Chapter MSTA
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #13 on: July 07, 2011, 07:04:26 PM »
Interesting, let us know how they look on your 55K inspection.  From the reports so far, they should not change much after the first one, but that remains to be seen en mass.

I'm not planning on taking my bike down to check them until we get stretch of some really ugly weather.  Our riding season is just too short to do that.  I may pop the valve cover at some point and measure, then button it up to ride while I get any bucket shims needed, then dig in again to 'adjust' them.

I never did hear why the manufacturers changed from the adjustable screw & jam nut design to the shim design.  Sure makes the valve adjust a lot less convenient.

I am hoping not to have to change any shims this time but if I have to, THIS IS our "really ugly weather" down here and I have  2 cooler bikes to ride. As for the shim under bucket I seem to recall that in general it was a design change more suitable for higher output, higher RPM engines.
It is maybe cheaper to build also.
Nothing worse than having your balls go missing.

Offline booger

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 489
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2011, 08:30:26 PM »
My shop mechanic says he usually only has to go through the motions on the 15K.   Very rarily has to adjust one.

Offline Shoe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 232
  • Country: us
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #15 on: July 08, 2011, 06:56:23 AM »
........ I may pop the valve cover at some point and measure, then button it up to ride while I get any bucket shims needed, then dig in again to 'adjust' them.
..............

There is too much work involved to do all that buttoning and unbuttoning for me. Unless there is a problem its one unbutton/button per adjust for me.   :'(
« Last Edit: July 08, 2011, 07:31:31 AM by Shoe »
Eat corn. Drill for oil.

2008 Concours, 2010 Goldwing

Offline lather

  • Arena
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1591
  • Country: us
  • And I think my spaceship knows which way to go...
    • Louisiana Chapter MSTA
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #16 on: July 08, 2011, 09:36:40 AM »
I just finished measuring my clearances. All Intakes valves are in spec, all but 2 at .006.
All Exhaust valves are out of spec tight. All but one EX are at .006 and that at .007.

This is at 55,000 miles and again the first adjustment was done at 20,000.
Nothing worse than having your balls go missing.

Offline B.D.F.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4955
  • Country: 00
  • It's only really cold if you fall down in it.
    • C-14 farkles you almost cannot ride without.
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #17 on: July 08, 2011, 10:32:30 AM »
Just my opinion but that is a lot of work to do twice to adjust the valve lash on a C-14. Doing it once is more than enough for most of us, never mind twice (for the same maintenance instance).

Adjusting screws and locknuts require rocker arms, which have more mass than in- line valve systems like the shimmed type. Shim over bucket requires the shim also function as the cam contact point and so the shim has to be quite large in diameter, as does the bucket that holds it. They are very easy to change but are bigger and heavier than they need to be. Shim under bucket is a very small, light system that allows very high engine RPM due to light valve train components. It is also a more precise system than most (or all) others and will hold a lash setting for a long time. The downside to the shim under bucket system is that it is more difficult to adjust; still, we spend a lot more time riding than maintaining the bike so it is a good idea overall I think.

Brian


Interesting, let us know how they look on your 55K inspection.  From the reports so far, they should not change much after the first one, but that remains to be seen en mass.

I'm not planning on taking my bike down to check them until we get stretch of some really ugly weather.  Our riding season is just too short to do that.  I may pop the valve cover at some point and measure, then button it up to ride while I get any bucket shims needed, then dig in again to 'adjust' them.

I never did hear why the manufacturers changed from the adjustable screw & jam nut design to the shim design.  Sure makes the valve adjust a lot less convenient.
Homo Sapiens Sapiens and just a tad of Neanderthal but it usually does not show....  My Private mail is blocked; it is not you, it is me, just like that dating partner said all those years ago. Please send an e-mail if you want to contact me privately.

KiPass keeping you up at night? Fuel gauge warning burning your retinas? Get unlimited peace and harmony here: www.incontrolne.com

Offline lather

  • Arena
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1591
  • Country: us
  • And I think my spaceship knows which way to go...
    • Louisiana Chapter MSTA
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #18 on: July 08, 2011, 10:57:33 AM »
Crap! I have 7 of the 8 shims I need in my stockpile!
Anyone willing to swap me their #20 (2.20 mm) for just about anything else. Or even 2 for 1

UPDATE: I got a call from Shoe, he is sending a couple of shims. Thanks Shoe!
« Last Edit: July 08, 2011, 05:28:43 PM by lather »
Nothing worse than having your balls go missing.

Offline C1xRider

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 836
  • Country: us
  • Where did all the posts go?!??
Re: 15K Valves: How bad were they?
« Reply #19 on: July 08, 2011, 01:04:23 PM »
Just my opinion but that is a lot of work to do twice to adjust the valve lash on a C-14. Doing it once is more than enough for most of us, never mind twice (for the same maintenance instance).

Adjusting screws and locknuts require rocker arms, which have more mass than in- line valve systems like the shimmed type. Shim over bucket requires the shim also function as the cam contact point and so the shim has to be quite large in diameter, as does the bucket that holds it. They are very easy to change but are bigger and heavier than they need to be. Shim under bucket is a very small, light system that allows very high engine RPM due to light valve train components. It is also a more precise system than most (or all) others and will hold a lash setting for a long time. The downside to the shim under bucket system is that it is more difficult to adjust; still, we spend a lot more time riding than maintaining the bike so it is a good idea overall I think.

Brian

Thanks for the info Brian, and here I thought it was just to drive more people to the dealers to support their shops.  ;)
--------------------   BACK UP YOUR DISKS PEOPLE!! -------------------------------
2012 K1600 GTL 8), 2010 C14 ABS, 2002 HD FXSTDI, 2000 XT350, 1998 C10, 1983 V65 Magna, 1978 HD SX250