« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2013, 05:36:07 AM »
Max, I was just making a statement not an accusation.
No prob
I was saying that was the worst case of abuse, but even so however briefly the shift is done, it will cause more wear than using the clutch. It may be so minor as to make the whole thing an exercise in microns but the two gears have to be at the same speed and that is more efficient if the clutch separates the engine from input of the transmission.
I could agree with that. But what I was saying is that using the clutch puts some wear on the clutch. So which do you think is more total wear on the two systems combined? Perfect (or consistently good) clutchless shifting or regular clutch shifting?
Logged
Shoodaben (was Guhl) Mountain Runner ECU flash, Canyon Cages front/rear, Helibars risers, Phil's wedges, Grip Puppies, Sargent World seat-low & heated & pod, Muzzy lowering links, Soupy's stand, Nautilus air horn, Admore lightbar, Ronnie's highway pegs, front running lights, all LED, helmet locks, RAM Xgrip, Sena SMH10, Throttle Tamer, MRA X-Creen, BearingUp Shifter, PR4-GT, Scorpion EXO-T1200,etc